About

lachlanmcfarlane

Bio:

View complete profile

 

5 thoughts on “About

  1. Hi i read your article about how your voting yes for same sex marriage.

    Jeaus Christ the living God used to live around many closet gays in his day with full knowledge of their attractions. Jesus stood up for many cultral outcast that mosaic law would otherwise reject even kill. From adulters to lepers to murderers to people living together out of wedlock etc. He knew all their flaws and he loved them all telling them SIN. NO.MORE. he never stood up or condoned same sex attraction but stood up for adulterers and murderers.

    When Jesus was asked about marriage there was most likley a few people in the crowd with same sex attraction and Jesus with full knowledge of gays in his midst said have you not heard God made them MALE AND FEMALE for this reason a MAN shall leave his MOTHER and FATHER and the two shall become one.

    JESUS CHRIST THE LIVING GOD SAID IF YOU LOVE ME YOULL OBEY ME SO WHEN IT COMES TO MARRIAGE HE KNOWS WHAT HES TALKING ABOUT FULL KNOWLEDGE OF HUMAN SIN BUT STILL SAID MARRIAGE IS FOR MALE AND FEMALE IF YOU LOVE JESUS YOU ACCORDING TO JESUS WOULD OBEY HIS COMMAND OF MALE AND FEMALE

    Unless you just love Jesus when its culturly appropriate lol

  2. I really appreciate your article “I’m a Conservative Christian, and I Intend to Vote “Yes” to Same-Sex Marriage” separating legal and moral witness. Just wondering how your opinion is on the church performing or blessing SSM. How does your argument work out?
    Gerrit

  3. Dear Lachlan,

    With respect, you may wish to:

    1) re-read your bible;
    2) read the preamble of our Constitution and section 116;
    3) talk to family law court judges or experienced family law legal practitioners in relation to the best interest of children.

    There is no right to practise sexual immorality. “Love is love” is not an argument, and that is why we have laws against incest, even if there is mutual consent. “Same sex marriage” is a misleading term. It should be called the re-definition of marriage.

    Wish you all the best in future.

  4. Dear Lachlan,

    With respect, you may wish to:

    1) re-read your bible;
    2) read the preamble of our Constitution and section 116;
    3) talk to family law court judges or experienced family law legal practitioners in relation to the best interest of children.

    There is no right to practise sexual immorality. “Love is love” is not an argument, and that is why we have laws against incest, even if there is mutual consent. “Same sex marriage” is a misleading term. It should be called the re-definition of marriage.

    Wish you all the best in future.

    Yours faithfully,

    Max Wong
    #2210

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s